Deveopment with Rational Rose

today i will use my way to study UML and Rose.This book's name is UML WITH RATIONAL ROSE.
i will writing my note after readed each chapter.
now,let's begin.
chapter one:introduce about uml.
question:how to use the best way to build a software?
a good development process is the first important.
it include about those part:project start,refinement,construct and commit.
in the part of project start,you should plan the period,budget and ascertain the feasibility.maybe we will build some simple use case.
my question is in fact we almost hard to got the full requirement at the begin,so how did i to make a exact project period?
the follow part is refinement,we will make a development plan,and anlayze the requirement,constructure desing.
after complet desing,we should write some test to verify our desing whether statisfy the requirement.
in the construct part,we will write code under the desing constructrue carefully.and do some unit test to ensure the code quality.

Hi, Ogogogo,
I'm not familiar with the technology you are talking about.
But there are a number of mistakes in your English notes.

e.g.
i will writing my note after readed each chapter.
introduce about uml.
a good development process is the first important.
it include about those part:project start,refinement,construct and commit.
maybe we will build some simple use case.
my question is in fact we almost hard to got the full requirement at the begin,so how did i to make a exact project period?

Sorry, I don't want to go on the listing.
Please use MS Word to check the obvious spelling and grammar problems before posting.
I’m willing to work with you to revise the post.


Thank you.

那种熟悉的、似曾相识的感觉原来2楼热心的mm也读到了。。。

这位大哥的英语比那个三八jiao zhu好多了……

ok,ok.
i never mind so many guys concerned about this article.
in fact,i just want to upgrade my english level.
i was failed pass the cet-4 in colledge.
so,if i have some mistake,thanks for your point out.
best regards.

by the way,i was a protoss user.

i was failed pass the cet-4 in colledge.

thanks for your point out.